|  Login |  Register

Vancouver Voices

Follow the links to read more

Welcome to Vancouver Voices

Below you will discover fresh voices from around the lower-mainland, in some instances to further reaches. These are Wonderful Voices, Interesting Voices, Challenging Voices, and most importantly, they are your Voices.

Our Voices matter more now than they ever did. The pace of change continues to accelerate just as technology and life around us speeds up. We've worked hard to bring you more alternative views, stronger voices, visionary perspectives, and challenging ideas through incorporating Blog Feeds from Vancouver relevant RSS Feeds. It is absolutely amazing what is out there. We hope you enjoy as much as we are.

Note: If you saw something on the home page that isn't showing here, just click Refresh so your browser reloads the page. This page displays the blog-posts randomly so it might take a few tries to find what you were looking for. Just remember to Bookmark the Blog if you want to keep up with them regularly.

The Proposal

November 28, 2007

A lot of you won't believe me, but the Canada Council was started with agents from the British Secret Service. You have to remember your history here, because the sixties were not just a time of flowers, peace and lsd, it was a time of radical political change. There were socialist agitators around the world, it looked at one point, that the movement of the people for a just society was going to win. Artists were the most visually active, we were coming out of the McCarthy era, the american right wing hated artists and there was an enormous cross border cultural exchange going on all over the world. When the Canada Council for the Arts started we were still at Her Majesty's Service, we were still in the cold war, England was an old power and something had to be done about those commies in the National Film Board. More on this later in, "Understanding the Complicity of Artists" which is still under constuction.

Meanwhile I would like to apologize for likening chronically multi-funded artists to pigs feeding at the trough of the Canada Council. What is actually happening is that there are big huge fat pigs sitting right in the trough with a few mean leanies that they allow to get the occasional feed in order to remain loyal.

Noone seems to recognize the damage this does to other artists, their work or even recognition of the enormous output of artists everywhere. The system discourages art as a career, proping it up with a network of art welfare to the chosen few who have volunteered to maintain this selective structure, that has nothing to do with good or bad art.

So my proposal, which follows, for a women's art history project, was turned down, for whatever reason they thought of this time. The excuse for turning down the previous eco/art proposal was it "wasn't conceptualized enough". I wrote them back and asked what they specifically meant by this vague catch all phrase and they haven't answered, yet, it has been about a month. They did this to me last year, as well. I think the problem is that they don't know what they mean, they really are arrogant.

PART C - DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM OF WORK

My project is to research and document the women identified below, as well as Marsha Stone, Rene Rodin and Marie Baker, to achieve a better historical record that reflects a more accurate view of west coast culture, by producing one hour per artist of edited material, in order to prepare a proposal for the production of a film and/or digital media that would include more women artists from this period and to exhibit and disseminate this material.

From a historical perspective, prior to Canada Council funding, Vancouver was a community of artists, working together, organizing shows, festivals and readings, perhaps 'artists colony' would be the best description, it was a cool place to be in the early sixties, having attracted literary luminaries like Malcolm Lowry and for many years before that a pretty hip music scene. At this time there was equality for women artists, who were not inhibited in producing their art, for example, prior to Intermedia, Jone Payne did pyrotechnics at the Vancouver Art Gallery, Jeanie Kamins made community art, Maxine Gadd and Judith Copithorn, readings at the Sound Gallery.

By introducing a structure for distribution of funding, sold to us under the guise of more freedom to make art, the Canada Council undermined the community by removing the incentive for the production of art for the self, and replaced it with production of art for the state, and a funding hierarchy, dominated by men of course, this being the sexist sixties. At that point, alternative art became institutionalized, artists economically controlled by their "peers", through the funding. ??At the Visual Poetry Festival at UBC in 1967, all the media attention was diverted to Michael Morris and Gary Lee Nova, the "stars" of Intermedia. Other male artists of Intermedia went on to teaching in major educational facilities, young women training as art workers were subjected to this same attitude. Most of the contemporary women artists, were ignored, forgotten or marginalized by the nature of their work which was often organic. Helen Goodwin, exhausted by the years of unsuccessful funding for her dance group, eventually walked into the ocean. The traditions of that aesthetic and subsequent power structure continue to this day. Conveniently, one history is written and another is entirely forgotten with the aid of Canada Council funded art history books.
?
Many of the women I knew from that earlier period, could be classified as "behind the scenes" women. The vibrant artists scene could not have existed without these women, who made up the audience, cooked and provided food and support, gave birth to the children, contributed ideas, worked on the projects without getting credit, but most of all, were discouraged by the prevailing chauvinist climate to be artists in their own right. Some women became wives or partners and due to their connection in this way, seemed to garner more credibility. The other way for women media artists to become accepted was to become part of the groups who were offshoots of Intermedia, such as the Western Front or the Video Inn and later, during the seventies, Pumps. It is interesting to note that while the "men" belong to "schools" of art during this period, artists like Gathie Falk and Martha Sturdy stand out as individuals.

Women artists working in the fields of social justice or textiles were not considered important. Their work was not seen as a contribution to art or culture, but instead was taken for granted. One example of these women was Melissa Gibbs who was part of the New Era Social Club collective along with Roy Kiyooka and Glen Lewis and who worked at the Georgia Straight during the early seventies. She assisted Dan McLeod during a very difficult period when he was close to losing a newspaper that is now highly successful and cannot be ignored as part of the west coast identity. Her presence within the art scene is difficult to define, but the whole culture of the late sixties and seventies in Vancouver is impossible to keep within the bounds of art history, but is more suitable to an anthro-social scrutiny. For instance, why does the Museum of Anthropology contain works of art?

Melissa recently died and within two months of her death every vestige of her life has been erased. Many of her old friends were not notified of her death, and, with the exception of the antique dealer's cherry picking, the remaining antiques, collectables and works of art that she had amassed for 40 years were thrown into bags, hauled out to the back yard and sold in a yard sale, what ever was left over was thrown back in the house or left outside in garbage bags in the rain. Her collection wasn't something a million people couldn't replace, but it was the way she made the essence or quality or that object become more understood, in juxtaposition to the objects around. This ability to "appreciate" is also what she did for the many artists and musicians she knew. It was possible to have made some record for what she contributed, but because she was not "recognized" her life was unimportant, her estate decimated by people who knew the price of everything and the value of nothing. The pieces of her that are left in peoples memory will soon also be gone. It was amidst the broken pieces of Melissa's house that I achingly wandered through, in a search for a bead loom that she had designed and that I found by some miracle in the bottom of a closet in the wreckage of her sewing room, on the second day of my search.

It is these women's depth of relationship to the community and their art form that I wish to translate into the digital medium. These women are full of stories, they deserve to be passed on.

The project will include a trip to Porpoise Bay in August, to interview Jone Pane, to Victoria in July, for Marsha Stone and to the interior of B.C. for Marie Baker in September. Some time will be needed to spend with all of these artists, their friends and their families. I have included an honorarium for each of the artists or their families to compensate for their time.

I will be acquiring documentation and conducting interviews prior to the filming. This grant will assist me in my pre production research through the subsistence portion of the budget.

Things you can’t say in fundraising

July 16, 2008

images1.jpg Hey guys! I’m “Raising More Money” with “Donor-Centred Fundraising!!”

That’s the kind of language that can get you in trouble. Those are trademarked phrases and they can’t be tossed around lightly. Tom Ahern has written a biting post on the subject.

If you are working in fundraising, you’ve witnessed the popularity of Penelope Burk’s “donor-centred fundraising” books, seminars and consulting. Even bigger is Terry Axelrod’s company Benevon (formerly called Raising More Money). You might have explored these programs in a hopeful quest for the secret to fundraising success (both profess to have it). You might have bought the books (I have) or attended a rather pricey seminar (guilty).

I think their approaches both work. But there isn’t anything revolutionary in them. There’s no secret. They are common sense, strategic approaches to fundraising. Follow the golden rule and treat donors well. Say thank you. Be super organized. Be respectful. Tell a good story. Use your assets. Follow through. Is this really new?

A few years ago I was shocked when a colleague received a cease-and-desist letter for using the term “Raise More Money” in a book title. She had been publishing fundraising books and advice for decades. Basically she taught people how to “raise more money.” How many ways are there to rephrase that? She was asked to stop because that phrase belongs to Axelrod. Don’t talk about an “Ask Event” or “Treasure Map” either.

It isn’t enough to make hundreds of thousands from nonprofits? Must you gag your competitors and colleagues too?

Rant over and out.

little stinker

May 16, 2008


I followed a skunk around a school playground this morning–hypnotized by his shiny black coat and playful demanor yet immobilized by fear: how exactly would I explain to my boss that I couldn’t come to work because I needed to burn my clothes and take a clamato shower?

First the cute little stinker tunneled under the slide, then galloped across the four-square, and finally found a trees to scratch at under the window of the grade two classroom.

But he’s so playful, I thought, drawing ever near, he wouldn’t squirt me. In fact, he didn’t even seem to notice I was there–until I flashed him with my camera.

One skunk stare was all it took to send me scampering on my way.

Before Katrina: The Gumbo World of 'Babylon Rolling' (in Tyee Books)

November 19, 2008

Novelist Amanda Boyden on New Orleans, hurricanes, fleeing or not, and more.

Peter Ladner Hears Raymond Louie Discussing $100M Loan on CKNW and Angrily Phones In

November 11, 2008

My guess is that Peter Ladner will lose the Mayor's race over the scandal involving a secret promise of a $100 million loan from the City to keep developers of the Olympic Village afloat. Add the $100 million to guarantees already given to the developers by the City and you're looking at roughly $300 million, in turbulent economic times. The Globe & Mail reports that early voting is more brisk

Reading the reader's mind

August 23, 2008



A busy week of business travel behind me, I will resume posts soon.

This cartoon is an apt representation of my work as a plain language consultant: http://www.comics.com/comics/fminus/index.html.

Caveat emptor: The Grant Institute

June 25, 2008

images1.jpg Some of you might have seen advertisements for (or even attended) a Grant Institute training program in Metro Vancouver in the past… If they come back again you might want to do some homework before signing up. The NonProfit Times has a story on the numerous complaints against them with Better Business Bureaus in the US. I’ve heard of similar problems with their programs in Canada. Buyer beware.

Mayor Sullivan Asked for Criminal Investigation into Ethel Whitty

November 14, 2008

Vancouver’s Mayor Sam Sullivan announced that he had picked up the phone this pre-election week to ask police to investigate the leak of a document from a secret meeting about a planned City bailout of the Olympic Village developer. So a Vancouver woman figures Sullivan can pick up the phone a second time before his term ends, and call police to request an investigation into allegations of fraud

WHERE WERE the NPA INCUMBENTS

October 19, 2008

Oldtown News
Vancouver, BC


WHERE WERE the NPA INCUMBENTS?
Mount Pleasant Pool should be designated a Heritage Site


Tonight, the Mount Pleasant Community Centre held its all-candidate meeting for Park board.

This neighborhood is deeply concerned about the loss of its swimming pool and child-care space at the current centre which is being phased out. Their new Centre at 1 Kingsway is not what the community asked for but for some reason the Park board went ahead with plans to build this new space.

Accessibility will be a major problem for kids living west of Main street who will need to cross Kingsway and Main which is a major automobile thorough-fare. The City and park board obviously didn't think this through properly.

Speaker after speaker at the Mt Pleasant meeting stated they preferred child-care and the pool to remain exactly where they are now and this is a simple request. In fact, long-time Mount Pleasant resident, Gavin Ross expressed his desire to have discussions re-opened regarding the Mount Pleasant child-care and the children's pool. All park board candidates in attendance when asked whether we would support this, stated yes.

It was sad that not one NPA incumbent Park Commissioner attended the meeting to address their decision making and the residents concerns.

The three NPA candidates, Laura McDiarmid, Christopher Richardson and Sharon Urton tried their best to answer residents concerns but unfortunately, the audience was not supportive and it became very difficult for the NPA candidates to defend their colleagues who embarked on what turned out to be un-neighbourly decision making.

Was great to see former Councillor Nancy Chiavario who chaired the meeting. Nancy serves as the Mount Pleasant centre board President and is doing great and looking great.

Perhaps a good case for saving the pool and the legacies of politicians like Nancy Chiavario, who served on Park board might be to designate Mount Pleasant pool a heritage site. So many outdoor community pools have been phased out and Mt Pleasant is our last remaining outdoor pool.

It seems a shame that kids are expected on warm summer days to swim indoors when outdoor pools have always served a useful purpose in this City.

Demolished outdoor pools include Sunset, Hastings and Marpole and soon Mount Pleasant. Interesting that 3 of these pools were located on the east side which is terribly park deficient to begin with.

This issue I suspect is going to gain traction and be a campaign issue and so it should.

Jamie Lee Hamilton
tricia_foxx@yahoo.com

Dreams for Women

June 14, 2008

I just wanted to apologize that there will be no Dreams for Women this Saturday. I am just back in Windsor, ON visiting family. I will be posting the next Dreams for Women next Saturday so long as my mother's scanner works! Take care and thanks for your support and submissions!

The Little Give is on!

June 20, 2008

biglittle.jpg Teams from Karyo Edelman are working with four Vancouver nonprofits to see how much good they can do in the next 48 hours. You can follow their progress online, through Twitter and with photos at www.thelittlegive.ca.

Go St. Elizabeth’s and Team 3 — the saints!

Dreams for Women - 12th Week!!

May 31, 2008












Here is the 12th week of the Dreams for Women art project and I just want to thank everyone for all the fabulous postcards that have been submitted so far. You gals have been doing such a fabulous job!
Thanks to all those who submitted... and keep it up... spread the word! I just wanted to remind readers that we currently only post postcards every second week! We're hoping to post them every week but we need your help! So get some friends together and make some postcards and send them in!

Also, here's another link to the new movie!











Antigone Magazine is launching a Feminist Postcard art project! We want to know what your Dreams for Women are.What are your own dreams for yourself, your friends, your sisters, your daughters? Paint, draw, write, sketch or decoupage your dreams on a postcard and send it to the address below:

Antigone Magazine
C/O WILLA UBc
Box 61-6138 SUB Boulevard
Vancouver, BC, Canada
V6T 1Z1
OR
With your postcard submission, we ask that you make a donation (if you can!) to Antigone Magazine for anywhere from $1 to $10. You can send your money along with your postcard or donate on our blog: http://www.antigonemagazine.blogspot.com/ .
But don't worry... if you don't have the money, just send along the postcard and tell people about this program.
What is Antigone Magazine? We're a grassroots national magazine that works to encourage young women to get involved in politics in Canada. We work to empower young women to engage politically and civically and to actively take part in leadership roles.We are raising the money in order to help launch the Antigone Foundation, a national foundation that will encourage young women aged 10-30 to get politically and civically engaged. Help support Antigone as we help to make the dreams of young women come true!

NPA Promises "Mobile Foot Washing" on Vancouver Streets

November 12, 2008

Photo: All Candidates Meeting at Carnegie Centre on Monday (left to right) Raj Hundal, Vision Parks Board candidate; Andrea Reimer, Vision Council candidate; Michael Geller, NPA Council candidate; Leanore Copeland, NPA Council candidate Leanore Copeland, NPA candidate for Vancouver City Council, reminded the audience at an All Candidates meeting in the Carnegie Center theater on Monday that she

Honour a donor with a Giving Hearts Award

July 17, 2008

Hearts.jpg AFP Vancouver has extended the deadline for nominations for the Giving Hearts Awards. This is a very nice way to honour you most important donors in three categories: Outstanding Philanthropist, Outstanding Corporation and Outstanding Youth Philanthropist. The nomination is not hard to do and your donors will be honoured that you’ve taken the time to honour them in this way. The deadline is August 15, 2008.

For more information visit the AFP website to download the Giving Hearts Awards Information Sheet and Nomination Form. The Awards will be presented at this year’s National Philanthropy Day luncheon, November 14, 2008.

Dreams for Women - Week Eight!

April 05, 2008












Here is the 8th official week of the Dreams for Women art project. Someone was asking the other day where the 8th week was... and I just wanted to remind readers that we currently only post postcards every second week! We're hoping to post them every week but we need your help! So get some friends together and make some postcards and send them in!

First Week

Second week

Third Week

Fourth Week

Fifth Week


Seventh Week


Also, here's another link to the movie!




Antigone Magazine is launching a Feminist Postcard art project! We want to know what your Dreams for Women are.What are your own dreams for yourself, your friends, your sisters, your daughters? Paint, draw, write, sketch or decoupage your dreams on a postcard and send it to the address below:


Antigone Magazine
C/O WILLA UBC
Box 61-6138 SUB Boulevard
Vancouver, BC, Canada
V6T 1Z1

OR

With your postcard submission, we ask that you make a donation (if you can!) to Antigone Magazine for anywhere from $1 to $10. You can send your money along with your postcard or donate on our blog: http://www.antigonemagazine.blogspot.com/ .

But don't worry... if you don't have the money, just send along the postcard and tell people about this program.

What is Antigone Magazine? We're a grassroots national magazine that works to encourage young women to get involved in politics in Canada. We work to empower young women to engage politically and civically and to actively take part in leadership roles.We are raising the money in order to help launch the Antigone Foundation, a national foundation that will encourage young women aged 10-30 to get politically and civically engaged. Help support Antigone as we help to make the dreams of young women come true!

A new logo for information literacy

August 11, 2008



A new, international, logo has been developed to represent information literacy.

The sponsor, Information Literacy Section of IFLA, for UNESCO, says:

The aim of creating this Logo is to make communication easier between those who carry out information literacy projects, their communities, and society in general. The Logo will be available free of charge and promoted as an international symbol of information literacy.


The American Library Association describes information literacy this way:

“To be information literate, a person must be able to recognize when information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate, and use effectively the needed information. The information literate individuals are those who have learned how to learn”
(ALA, 1998)

I prefer the perspective adopted by Sheila Webber at the Information Literacy Weblog:

"Information Literacy--
the adoption of appropriate information behaviour to identify, through whatever channel or medium, information well fitted to information needs, leading to wise and ethical use of information in society"

Edgar Luy Pérez, the artist, says of the design:
"The book, open and next to the circle [representing study], comprises with it a visual metaphor representing those people who have the cognitive tools to reach information in a nimble way, as well as the desire to share this ability."

Best election ad ever?

November 13, 2008


<!-- Valid XHTML flash object delivered by XHTML Video Embed. Get it at: http://saltwaterc.net/xhtml-video-embed -->

This is by no means an endorsement, but this could very well be my favorite campaign advert ever.

Related posts:

  1. Matthew Good does my election research for me, Hedy Fry decieves the internet and I watch The Office Since apparently I live in the same federal riding as...
  2. If I were Prime Minister, I’d get paid better Vancouver environmental hero David Suzuki has challenged Canadians to...
  3. Canadian Election Debate, Live from Vancouver I'm listening to the Canadian election debate right now....

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Just Desserts at the Downtown Community Court

September 29, 2008

Usually when a Downtown Eastsider walks into a courthouse, they expect to be served something other than jumbo chocolate chip cookies. But that's what they got this afternoon at the opening lunch of the new Community Court on Gore St. near Cordova, beside the Sunrise Market. The Community Court, which began operating earlier this month and is modeled on one in New York City, will offer a quick

Comment > It Matters

November 18, 2008

Comment on "Letter From Linda: Vote VO in BC Blog Contest": Thank you so much, Shelly.

bite the hand

July 10, 2008

A feminist critique of the Canada Council and the funding system that can make or break an artist in Canada. Too often, one is afraid to address injustice for fear of destroying one's career. So what have I got to lose?

The following is a response to reportage in the Georgia Straight on arts in B.C. In the Nov. 2 issue there were two seemingly unrelated articles in the arts section, that both had references to survival as an artist.

From a historical perspective, prior to Canada Council funding, Vancouver was a community of artists, working together, organizing shows, festivals and readings, perhaps 'artists colony' has some meaning to people. At this time there was equality for women artists, who were not inhibited in producing their art, for example, Jone Payne did pyrotechnics at the Vancouver Art Gallery, Jeanie Kamins made community art, Maxine Gadd and Judith Copithorn, readings at the Sound Gallery.

By introducing a structure for distribution of funding, sold to us under the guise of more freedom to make art, the C.C. destroyed the community and replaced it with a hierarchy, dominated by men of course, this being the sexist sixties. At that point, alternative art became institutionalized, artists economically controlled by their "peers", through the funding. My theory, that the best government control mechanism for any free thinking or radical group is to find the morally weak and set them up as the representatives. Once created, this machine will self replicate.

At the Visual Poetry Festival at UBC in 1967, all the media attention was diverted to Michael Morris and Gary Lee Nova, the "stars" of Intermedia. Other male artists of Intermedia went on to teaching in major educational facilities, young women training as art workers were subjected to this same attitude. Most of the contemporary women artists, were ignored, forgotten or marginalized by the nature of their work which was often organic. Helen Goodwin, exhausted by the years of unsuccessful funding for her dance group, eventually walked into the ocean. The traditions of that aesthetic and subsequent power structure continue to this day. Conveniently, one history is written and another is entirely forgotten with the aid of Canada Council funded art history books. ?

Many of the women I knew from that earlier period, could be classified as "behind the scenes" women. The vibrant artists scene could not have existed without these women, who made up the audience, cooked and provided food and support, contributed ideas, worked on the projects without getting credit but were really discouraged by the prevailing chauvinist climate to be artists in their own right. Some women became wives or partners and due to their connection in this way, seemed to garner more credibility. The other way for women media artists to become accepted was to become part of the groups who were offshoots of Intermedia, such as the Western Front or the Video Inn and later, during the seventies, Pumps. It is interesting to note that while the "men" belong to "schools" of art during this period, artists like Gathie Faulk and Martha Sturdy stand out as individuals.

Women artists working in the fields of social justice or textiles were not considered important. Their work was not seen as a contribution to art or culture, but instead was taken for granted. One example of these women was Melissa Gibbs who was part of the New Era Social Club collective along with Roy Kiyooka and Glen Lewis and who worked at the Georgia Straight during the early seventies. She assisted Dan McLeod during a very difficult period when he was close to losing a newspaper that is now highly successful and cannot be ignored as part of the west coast identity. Her presence within the art scene is difficult to define, but the whole culture of the late sixties and seventies in Vancouver is impossible to keep within the bounds of art history, but is more suitable to an anthro-social scrutiny. For example, why does the Museum of Anthropology contain works of art?

The Complicity of Artists Funding in All Of This

This year, not including matching grants from other funding sources, the Canada Council gave the largest artist run groups, Western Front Society, a privately owned institution, $221,500 and Video Inn/Satellite Video Exchange over $200,000. They, along with artists and and other gallery administrator/curators connected to them, have dominated "alternative art" for over 30 years, in Vancouver, and along with their contemporaries in other parts of Canada, through the artist run gallery system.

Although some galleries try to remain independent and some people in ARGs are socially responsible, the lure of accessible money and guaranteed success is far too tempting to ignore. Why bite the hand that feeds? Now, the $50 million in "supplementary grants to help arts organizations that already receive council funding" (Heather Redfern, executive director of Vancouver’s Alliance for Arts and Culture), reward is heaped on reward.

"Redfern pointed out that the $50 million is just a short-term commitment to two years’ worth of funding. What’s needed next, she said, is to make the $50 million a permanent increase, and then beef it up with the added $100 million arts groups say is needed to sustain and grow culture in this country." (Straight-Nov2, 2006) (Organizations can start applying for the supplementary grants through www.canadacouncil.ca/ beginning Monday [November 6]; the deadline is December 15. Their proposed two-year plans will be assessed by a jury of peers.)

"The other third of the new money is being earmarked for increased support to individual artists, and for both improving public access to the arts and helping Canadian troupes tour the country and internationally. “There’s been an explosion of touring in Canada, both internationally and within the country, but funds have not increased to match that,” said a supportive Redfern. “I’ve been on a [council] touring jury and it’s heartbreaking.”> Janet Smith - Georgia Straight, Nov2, 2006

So, if the present system is fair, why are the majority of full time dedicated artists and musicians still starving, while art industry salaried or successful professionals get the biggest grants?

There is no longer any artistic free will, as (Ron) Burnett (President, ECIAD) says, "We're trying to resituate the process of creativity within an understanding of how industry works. For example, if they want to be a painter, they have to understand how the gallery system works." > Janet Smith - Georgia Straight, Nov2, 2006

What is this system? It is the funding industry run by arts organizations through the "jury of peers". Artists are no longer trained to be artists, but 'art businessmen', using connections to "sell" their work to the galleries, networking their way to the top to become "established". Coupled with matching grants from other funding bodies, these "established" artists are eligible for huge amounts of money, for BC this year, for example from the C.C. alone, Jeff Carter $45,000, Claudia Minerva Culos-Medina $59.000, Julie Andreyev $60,000, David Rimmer $60,000, Jean Routhier $60,000, Steven Sanderson $50,000, Paul Wong $60,000 and others for a total of $796,486 for individual artists in the Media Arts.

True, media art costs a lot of money, but the costs of production in digital media has significantly decreased and a lot of equipment and facilities are already paid for, supposedly for artists use. But this is always designated by a careful bureaucracy, to artists who bring in more money through their projects. Media artists and musicians should have better access to the tools of production based on need, that doesn't include the inherent politics of these groups and pre-approved art. For a while, there was some social justice funding to media for community work, but that ended when the "Arts and Media" got changed to the "Media Arts", under Tom Sherman. When the C.C. gets its funding cut, "it" will consolidate. You can bet that when Harper starts hacking, it won't be the funding to well established groups.


However, if an artist is "established", why go to the CC for money? Wouldn't an "established" artist have more luck raising funds from other industry sources?

The $17.4 million in grants to B.C. from the C.C. for 2005 - 2006 was represented by a total of 106 jurors from BC. That's $174,000 aprox. (or more?)designated by each juror and well worth having some connection to. We are specifically told, from an industry viewpoint, to network, as part of our job as an artist. Having someone from your group working at the C.C. probably also helps.

"The figures are quite clear," said FranÃcois Lachapelle, head of the section, on the line to the Straight from Ottawa. "Only 15 or 10 years ago, we were able to fund roughly one artist out of three applicants on the senior level. Now we cannot assist more than one artist out of 10 applicants." The council's proposed solution is to cut the pie up in a radically new way. The most striking of the suggested changes is at the top of the system. The richest funds handed out under the current arrangement--$34,000 grants, each intended to fund a year of work by an established visual artist--would be replaced by a group of $50,000 allotments, each renewable over three years for a total of $150,000 apiece, a drool-inducing prospect for most working artists. - Brian Lynch, Straight, Nov. 2004

Peggy Campbell, a filmmaker who is trying to be helpful, gives workshops on how to make your application "stand out from the rest". It's competition, using all the rules of cutthroat business, not for the sake of art, but rather the art form of bureaucracy, clothing the machinations of control.

Curators/artists are churned out by the dozen every year, locked into this system. Society has spent a lot of money on the children they love, to become artists, there has to be some sort of industry to take them. Unfortunately, the industrial commodity is our most sacred creative quality. Why has art become sublimated to this atrocity?

"But at the same time, the economies necessary to support it remain fragile, and questions about representation and identity – “Whose art is it, anyway?” – are constant reminders of the vagaries of art’s integral “value.”" - Melanie O'Brian. While the eagerly awaited, "Vancouver Art and Economies", co-published with Artspeak, ("one of Canada’s most influential artist-run centres, assesses the “state of the arts” in Vancouver" - Arsenal Pulp), is not yet available through the public library's reference section, I doubt it will address the inequities I have touched on above but will focus on Vancouver's lusty photo conceptual industry.

Under the C.C.'s soviet style socialism, you have to focus on their industrial structure as a means of survival as an artist. It requires time and inclination to become a robot in their system, which is ironic as the WF has 6 artists in residence rendering that very thing. Another linguistic irony is the use of the word "swarm" and "INfest" for the annual get together of government funded artist run galleries. "InFest is about infesting the world with these new models of galleries," (Keith) Wallace says, as the meeting breaks up and Western Front members clatter around in the kitchen at the back of their building. The sun has set. It's time for dinner. - "Artists at the Helm", Robin Laurence, Straight, Feb. 2004

Some artists will get a lifetime of support because they are closely networked into this structure. They know how to get the grants. Look at the records. The protective urban mythology surrounding the grant system is "a crap shoot", "roll of the dice", "luck of the draw", "I just do it to keep in practise". Why fill out an application form, which takes significant work, why not just get a ticket? A lottery system would actually work if it was fair, putting previous winners out of the draw.

Finally, there is no transparency in the way the money is distributed, C.C. reports are always two years behind, you never find out who are on these juries, unless you applied for a grant and make a request in writing after you get the results. What are they ashamed of? You'd think they would be proud of these awards, publish the profiles and projects of the artists and organizations on the web along with the juries that selected them. Artists who have been unsuccessful should also have the right to have their project published to see what we have missed in our cultural landscape.

Is it too much to ask that all funding bodies publish this information, why must there be such a veil of secrecy if we are truly amongst our "peers"?